V.K.SHUKLA
SUB-INSPECTOR, C. P. (SPECIAL CATEGORY), IPATTAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
Hon’ble V.K. Shukla, J.—Petitioner has approached this Court questioning the validity of suspension order dated 21.7.2006 passed by Superintendent of Police, Bijnor.
2. Brief background of the case, as disclosed in the writ petition, is that petitioner has been performing and discharging duties as Sub Inspector. Report dated 12.7.2006 was submitted by the Circle Officer, Najibabad, mentioning therein that in proceeding under Section 107/116, Cr. P.C., petitioner incorrectly submitted report qua three persons, whose age in chalani report was shown as 35, 25 and 19 years respectively, whereas fact of the matter is that all these three incumbents, namely, Fehzan, Ahsan and Furkan were minor, as such petitioner has been negligent in submitting the aforementioned report without making any deep and pervasive enquiry in the same. Based on the said report, order of suspension has been passed and while passing the order of suspension, it has also been mentioned that preliminary enquiry be conducted within eight days and the report be submitted. At this juncture present writ petition has been filed.
3. Sri S.K. Shukla, learned Counsel for petitioner, contended with vehemence that under
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.