SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 2836

SHISHIR KUMAR, R.P.MISRA
DAYA SHANKAR TRIPATHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


JUDGMENT

By the Court.—These writ petitions have been filed for quashing the notices issued to the petitioners not to use the machines in the mining operations on the basis of the Government Orders issued by the State Government from time to time i.e. 30.11.2002 and 5.2.2003. As common questions are involved in all the writ petitions, as such, they are being decided by a common judgment.

2. The submission raised on behalf of the petitioners is that neither under the terms and conditions of the lease deed nor under any statutory rule there is any restriction or prohibition against the use of machines for the purposes of excavation of sand. As the petitioners are using machines for carrying on mining operations from the river bed and no restrictions whatsoever were placed on the use of machines by the respondents. In view of Rule 40 (c) of the rules, specifically mentions the use of machines for carrying on mining operations. The condition of the lease deed provide for the removal of machines etc. after the expiry of the lease deed meaning thereby that using of machines are permitted. The impugned orders mentioned that uses of machines are prohibited by the Government Order. It has fur





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top