SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 527

[2007(3) ADJ 255 (DB)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : V.M. SAHAI AND SABHAJEET YADAV, JJ.
Smt. MANJULA DEVI MISHRA AND OTHERS —Appellants
Versus
M/s. COMMERCIAL MOTORS, KANPUR AND OTHERS ——Respondents
(First Appeal From Order No. 628 of 1997, decided on 2nd March, 2007)

Advocates appeared:
Shakti Dhar Dubey for the Appellants; R.C. Gupta, N.C. Srivastava for the Respondents.

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988—Sections 140, 163-A, 165, 166, 168, 173 and 175—Claim petition—Contributory negligence—Powers of Claims Tribunal—Compensation Claim—Whether maintainable under M.V. Act of 1988, or before Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner under Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1923 as driver of vehicle was killed by outside agency—Tribunal holding that accident in question, was attributable to some outside agency, which was solely responsible for accident—And, that it was not caused by negligent driving of offending motor vehicle, hence, it has no jurisdiction to award any compensation therefor—Appeal against—Held, allegations and proof of negligence in use of motor vehicle, on part of driver or owner, was not a condition precedent for entertaining claim petition by Tribunal—What is essential is that accident, should be incidental to use of motor vehicle—Therefore, jurisdiction of Tribunal, should not be restricted to entertain and decide claims, arising out of negligence alone, in use of motor vehicle—Hence, claimants' claim petition succeed under Sections 166 and 163-A of Act of 1988—And claim petition, could be tried under both sections of Act of 1988—Impugned judgment and award of claims Tribunal, set aside—Matter remitted to Tribunal. [Paras 18, 21, 26, 29, 45 and 48]

       (B) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988—Sections 163-A and 166—Compensation—Award of—In case of death or permanent disablement due to accident—To the legal heir or victions—Quantion of compensation—Income claimed to be Rs. 3,000 p.m., and claim petition filed for Rs. 11,40,000—Income of deceased was below Rs. 40,000 p.a.—Aid of Second Schedule to Act of 1988, taken into consideration, while awarding compensation to claimants—As income of deceased was Rs. 36,000/- p.a., hence, deduction of 1/3rd, towards expenses of deceased—Pecuniary loss Rs. 24,000 p.a.—Multiplier of 18 adopted—Comes to Rs. 4,32,000, plus Rs. 2,000 for funeral expenses, Rs. 5,000 for loss of consortium Rs. 2,500 for loss of estate, total comes to Rs. 4,41,500, alongwith 7% interest, from date of application, till payment. [Para 47]

       

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—This appeal has been filed by the widow, son and mother of the deceased Awadhesh Kumar Mishra claiming compensation Rs. 11,40,000/- for the death of Awadhesh Kumar Mishra in an accident that took place on 23.1.1994 while Awadhesh Kumar Mishra driver along with his co-driver and the cleaner was proceeding on truck No. U.P. 78B/0449 on 23.1.1994 at about 12.30 p.m. from Fatehpur to Kanpur via G.T. Road. The deceased Awadhesh Kumar Mishra was driving the truck. As soon as the truck reached in front of Chauhan hotel situated at G.T. Road, some mischievous and unruly boys who were standing by the side of the hotel gave signal to stop the truck. The deceased driver declined to stop the truck which infuriated the aforesaid boys and they started pelting brick-bats at the vehicle. The brick-bats hit Awadhesh Kumar Mishra over his eyes, as a result of which the vehicle was dis-balanced and fell into a ditch and dashed against a Babool tree lying on the side of the road. Consequently Awadhesh Kumar Mishra, driver and co-driver Dharmendra both died on the spot instantaneously. These deaths were attributed to the injuries sustained by the deceased in the aforesaid accident which occurred on account of mischievous and unruly felonious act of the aforesaid boys who pelted the brick-bats. The report of the incident was lodged at police station Kalyanpur, district Fatehpur. The post-mortem report on the body of the deceased was conducted. At the time of the accident the driver Awadhesh Kumar Mishra was found aged about 25 years and he left behind wife Manjula Devi, his son Ankur aged about 3 years, Kamla Devi, mother of the deceased. A claim petition was filed by the claimants on 19.4.1994 wherein monthly income of the deceased Awadhesh Kumar Mishra was claimed to be 3000/-. The claimants were dependents of the deceased and total compensation to tune of Rs. 11,40,000/- was claimed by them.

2. The claim petition was contested by the owner as well as the insurer of the vehicle on the ground that accident was not attributable to any negligent act of the driver of the vehicle and it was alleged that the deceased was involved in the accident which was result of his own individual act and such type of claim was not covered by the insurance policy. The claim was excessive, the claim was bad for non-joinder of necessary parties. The claim petition was also contested by the insurance company on the ground that the claim does not fall within the ambit of Motor Vehicles Act, the truck was driven by the deceased Awadhesh Kumar Mishra himself and the accident occurred when the deceased himself lost balance and the vehicle fell into the ditch. There was no negligence on the part of the owner of the vehicle and the insurance company could not be saddled with any liability to pay the compensation. The tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the claim petition and the claimants were not the dependents of the deceased nor the deceased driver was having a valid driving licence.

3. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held by judgment and award dated 1.5.1997 that the Tribunal has jurisdiction to decide the claim petition and it affirmed the findings recorded by order dated 4.4.1995 that the issue as to whether the claim petition was cognizable under the Motor Vehicles Act or Workmen’s Compensation Act holding that this claim petition could be decided by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The tribunal while deciding the issue as to whether accident occurred on 23.1.1994 due to the composite negligence of some outside agency and driver of truck No. UP 78-B/0449 resulting in the death of the driver and whether the deceased was having a valid driving licence at the time of the accident, held on the appreciation of the statement of PW-1 Smt. Manju Devi that the vehicle was insured and at the time of the accident the deceased Awadhesh Kumar Mishra was driving the truck, having a valid driving licence but accident in question is attributable to som
































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top