SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 2566

[2008(1) ADJ 537
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : SHISHIR KUMAR, J.
NIWAS SINGH ........Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS ......Respondents
(Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 3192 of 1986, decided on 8th October, 2007)

Advocates:
Counsel :
Ashok Khare, Shobhit Dubey, V.K. Singh, G.K. Singh, Sanjeev Kumar Gupta, Sudhanshu Srivastava for the Petitioner; S.D. Shukla, Gyan Prakash, S.C. for the Respondents.

Headnote:Salary—Payment of, to petitioner in Lecturer grade—Selection and appointment of petitioner in College in question as Assistant Grade teacher—Confirmation of petitioner, after expiry of period of probation—Then petitioner was qualified for being appointed as a Lecturer in Geography, as four posts of Lecturers were sanctioned, he applied for that post—But, subsequently selection with regard to post of Lecturer of Geography was cancelled, resulting only one post of Lecturer in English was filled-up by direct recruitment—Whereas post of Lecturer in Geography remained unfilled on date of promulgation of U.P. Secondary Education Services Commission and Selection Boards Ordinance, 1981—Out of four posts of Lecturers, two posts Hindi and Sanskrit were to be filled-up by promotion—Whereas two posts of Lecturers of English and Geography were advertised in newspapers—Petitioner was a senior-most teacher, and he was entitled to be promoted on Ad hoc basis—But, C.O.M. appointed some other teacher on the post of Lecturer in Geography by direct recruitment—But his appointment was cancelled by Director of Eduction on ground that vacancy in post of Lecturer in Geography was to be filled-up by promotion—Thereafter, petitioner was granted Ad hoc promotion by C.O.M.—And then petitioner joined his duties—And his appointment was approved by D.I.O.S.—Petitioner was paid his salary as a Lecturer from 1.12.1982 to January, 1985—And thereafter respondents stopped payment of salary to him—And he was suspended by Management—Hence, petition against—Held, respondents were directed by Court to permit petitioner to continue on that post—And pay arrears of salary, future salary etc. [Paras 12 to 15]

       

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Shishir Kumar, J.—By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has approached this Court for issuing a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the salary to the petitioner in lecturer grade.

2. There is Janta Inter College, Nawabganj, District Farrukhabad, which is a recognised and aided institution. As the provisions of the U.P. High School and Intermediate Colleges (Payment of Salaries to the Teachers and other Employees) Act, 1971 are applicable. The vacancy in L.T. Grade occurred in the college in the year 1980. The said vacancy was advertised and the petitioner applied for being appointed as Assistant Teacher in L.T. Grade. At that time the institution was recognised as High School. The petitioner was called for interview on the basis of his quality point marks amongst 7 candidates. The Selection Committee found the petitioner most suitable candidate and on its recommendation, the petitioner was appointed on probation with effect from 1.4.1980 as Assistant Teacher in L.T. Grade. The selection and appointment of the petitioner as Assistant Grade Teacher was made in accordance with the provisions of Chapter II of the Regulations framed under the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921. On expiry of aforesaid period of probation, the petitioner was confirmed. The institution in question being upgraded and recognised as an Intermediate College, four posts of Lecturer were sanctioned in December, 1980. The posts of Hindi and Sanskrit Lecturers were to be filled up by promotion whereas the two posts of English Lecturer and Geography Lecturer were advertised to be filled up by direct recruitment. As the petitioner was qualified for being appointed as lecturer in Geography, he applied for recruitment but subsequently the selection with regard to the post of the Geography Lecturer was cancelled with the result that only the post of Lecturer in English was filled up by direct recruitment whereas the post of Lecturer in Geography remained unfilled on the date of promulgation of Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Commission and Selection Boards Ordinance, 1981. In exercise of its powers under Section 33 of the Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Commission and Selection Boards Ordinance, 1981, the State Government issued an order known as Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Commission (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 1981, vide notification dated 31.7.1981. In which a provision was made for ad-hoc appointment. According to the Clause 4 of the Removal of Difficulties Order, 1981, every vacancy for the post of a teacher in Lecturer’s Grade was to be filled by promotion of the senior most teacher of the institution in the trained graduate (L.T. Grade). The petitioner was senior most teacher of the institution in the trained graduate, therefore, he was entitled to be promoted on ad-hoc basis under paragraph 4(2) of the Removal of Difficulties Order, 1981. In violation of provisions of the Removal of Difficulties Order, 1981, the Committee of Management illegally appointed one Naresh Singh Yadav as Lecturer (Geography) by direct recruitment on 1.10.1981. His appointment was cancelled by the Director of Education vide its order dated 15.1.1982 as the vacancy in the post of Lecturer in Geography was to be filled up by promotion.

3. The petitioner being the senior most teacher in the institution in L.T. Grade, the Committee of Management passed a resolution on 28.11.1982 for ad-hoc promotion of the petitioner. On the basis of the resolution of the Committee of Management, the petitioner joined his duties as Lecturer with effect from 1.12.1982. The proposal of the Committee of Management was approved by the District Inspector of Schools, Farrukhabad vide letter dated 1.1.1982. A copy of the same has been filed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition. The vacancy on the post of lecturer in Geography has not yet been notified by the Commission and to the best of the petitioner’s know



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top