Hon’ble Amar Saran, J.—Heard learned Counsel for the applicants and the learned AGA.

2. Learned A.G.A. concedes that no useful purpose would be served in issuing notice to the opposite party No. 2, as it would only lead to delay of disposal of this application and prays that the application may be decided at this stage after hearing learned Counsel for the applicants and State.

3. An order dated 6-9-2007 taking cognizance has been challenged in this case and it is argued that charge-sheet has only been submitted under Sections 323, 504, IPC. Reliance has been placed on the Explanation to Section 2(d) of Code of Criminal Procedure, which reads as follows :

“Explanation—A report made by a police officer in a case which discloses, after investigation, the commission of a non-cognizable offence shall be deemed to be a complaint; and the police officer by whom such report is made shall be deemed to be the complainant.”

4. Therefore, on the basis of aforesaid Explanation, which has been interpreted in a Single Judge decision of this Court in Dr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma v. State of U.P. and another, 2007(9) ADJ 478, it has been held that when the charge-sheet is only of non-cognizable off