SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 2711

R.K.AGRAWAL
PANKI THERMAL POWER STATION, PANKI, KANPUR – Appellant
Versus
LABOUR COURT-III, U. P. KANPUR – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Subhash Chandra Srivastava for the Petitioner; S.C. Shukla for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble R.K. Agrawal, J.—By means of the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, M/s Panki Thermal Power Station, Kanpur, seeks to challenge the award dated 31.8.1993 of the Labour Court (III), U.P., Kanpur, declaring that the workman, V.K. Srivastava, was entitled to get the designation and pay of R.G.C. since June, 1973.

2. Briefly stated, Sri V.K. Srivastava, workman, was appointed as Daftari with effect from 1.8.1972 vide office memo No. PEB-55-2A/1423 in the petitioner’s establishment which post he joined on 4.8.1972. Vide Office Memo dated 31.3.1978/4.4.1978, he was promoted as R.G.C. since 15.3.1978. According to the petitioner, vide order dated 20.9.1975, the workman was directed to help Sri P.S. Gupta, R.G.C., in his work. It was specifically provided in the order dated 20.9.1975 that the entire responsibility for disposal of the work would be on Sri P.S. Gupta. After the aforesaid order was passed, the workman started helping Sri P.S. Gupta in his work till his actual promotion on the post of R.G.C. from 15.3.1978. The workman through the Union raised a dispute claiming pay and designation of R.G.C. with effect fr




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top