SUNIL AMBWANI
U. P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
SHIV KUMAR GUPTA – Respondent
Hon’ble Sunil Ambwani, J.—Heard Shri Sameer Sharma, learned Counsel for U.P. State Road Transport Corporation (in short, the Corporation), for the petitioner and Shri R.N. Singh, Sr. Advocate assisted by Shri H.P. Dubey and Shri G.K. Malviya for the private respondents. Learned Standing Counsel appears for State respondents. With the consent of the parties the matter was heard and is being finally decided.
2. The Corporation is aggrieved by the decision of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, U.P. Lucknow (Appellate Tribunal) in Revision Nos. 88 to 101 of 2005 under Section 90 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by which the revisions were partly allowed and that while setting aside the order of the State Transport Authority, U.P. Lucknow dated 9.6.2005 the regular stage carriage permits were renewed for another usual term of five years with effect from their expiry, on usual terms and conditions, for the portion not covered under the scheme dated 29.5.1993, after curtailing the portion overlapping the portion under the scheme dated 29.5.1993.
3. The route Meerut-Muzaffarnagar to Bamanhedi was notified for exclusive operation by the Corporation by notification dated 12.5.1951.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.