SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(All) 1200

S.RAFAT ALAM, VIKRAM NATH
SANGEETA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
R.C. Singh for the Appellant; O.N. Rai, S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—This is intra Court appeal, under the Rules of the Court arising from the judgment of the Hon’ble Single Judge of this Court dated 7.4.2008 dismissing the petitioner-appellant’s Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 17785 of 2008 for quashing the order of the District Magistrate, Kushinagar dated 30.3.2008 whereby the financial and administrative power of the appellant has been suspended under the proviso to Section 95 (1)(g) of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 (for short the Act).

2. We have heard learned Counsel for the appellant and Sri O.N. Rai, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and also perused the record.

3. It appears that a proceeding under Section 95 (1)(g) of the Act is initiated against the petitioner-appellant. It further appears that the District Magistrate being satisfied with the report of the preliminary enquiry showing prima facie involvement of the petitioner-appellant in the alleged financial and other irregularities, withdrew the financial and administrative power of the appellant in exercise of the power conferred under the first proviso to Section 95 (1)(g) of the Act. The aggrieved appellant preferred the aforesaid writ petition,


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top