SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(All) 1412

TARUN AGARWALA
VINOD KUMAR SINGH. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
S.P. Singh Parmar and V.K. Singh for the Petitoner; S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Tarun AgarwaIa, J.—Heard Sri V.K. Singh, the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

2. A Class-IV post became vacant in the institution upon the retirement of Sri Jawahar on 31.3.2006. The Principal, being the competent authority, issued an advertisement in a daily newspaper on 17.6.2006 inviting applications for filling up the said post. The Principal also wrote a letter to the District Inspector of Schools seeking permission to fill up the said post. The District Inspector of Schools, by an order dated 19.6.2006, granted permission to the institution to fill up the vacancy. Based on the aforesaid advertisement, the petitioner also applied and was selected by the competent authority and, an appointment letter dated 28.6.2006 was issued. The necessary papers were forwarded by the Principal to the District Inspector of Schools for financial approval. The District Inspector of Schools, by an order dated 19.9.2006, refused to accord financial sanction to the appointment of the petitioner on the ground that previous permission had not been obtained by the institution before advertising the post and that only 11 days’ time













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top