SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(All) 1163

POONAM SRIVASTAVA
FAGGAN (DECEASED). – Appellant
Versus
BHAGWAN SAHAI (DECEASED) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Mrs. Poonam Srivastava, J.—Heard Sri R.S. Maurya, learned Counsel for the plaintiff/appellants and Sri S.S. Singh, learned Counsel for the defendant/respondents.

2. The instant second appeal arises out of the judgment and decree dated 7.11.1996 passed by the XVth Additional District Judge, Meerut, in Civil Appeal No. 76 of 1994 confirming the judgment and decree dated 8.4.1994 passed by the trial Court in original suit No. 409 of 1979.

3. The original suit was instituted for cancellation of the Will dated 14.12.1966 executed by one Khachedu in favour of the defendants. The plaintiffs case is that Khachedu had three sons namely Faggan (plaintiff), Bhagwan Sahai and Man Singh (defendants). Khachedu died on 16.7.1977. The plaintiff moved an application for mutation of his name over his 1/3 share, which was contested by the defendants on the basis of the Will dated 14.12.1966. Claim of the plaintiff/appellants is that the said Will is forged document and it was prepared only with an intention to grab share of the plaintiff. The plaintiff also claimed that the property was purchased by Khachedu from finances provided by the plaintiff. The defendants disputed the plaint cas





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top