PRAKASH KRISHNA
BUDHIMAN SINGH. – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT JUDGE, FATEHPUR – Respondent
Hon’ble Prakash Krishna, J.—By means of the present writ petition the petitioner has sought a writ, order .or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the judgement and order dated 28th April, 1982 passed by the District Judge, Fatehpur and the judgement and order dated 28th December, 1981 passed by the Prescribed Authority appointed under the provisions of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).
2. The present writ petition arises out of the proceedings under the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act. The impugned orders have been passed on the application filed under Section 13-A of the said Act by the petitioner.
3. This is third round of litigation in the High Court.
4. Shri Raghuraj Singh, father of the petitioner, was the original tenure holder to whom a notice under the unamended provisions of the Act under Section 10 (2) was issued declaring 1.04 acre of land as surplus. After the amendment of the Act, reducing the ceiling area a second notice was issued to Raghuraj Singh and an area of 7.03 acres was proposed as surplus. No objection was filed by Shri Raghuraj Singh and the Prescribed Authority
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.