SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(All) 1501

M.K.MITTAL
MAHESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
K.M. Asthana for the Revisionist; Bal Mukund, Smt. Arti Singh, A.G.A. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble M.K. Mittal, J.—Criminal Revision No. 1145 of 2005 has been filed by Smt. Manorama for setting aside the order dated 18.1.2005 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Kanpur Nagar, in Misc. Case No. 33 of 2002 whereby he rejected the application filed by Smt. Manorama under Section 127, Cr.P.C. for enhancement of the maintenance amount awarded under Section 125, Cr.P.C. by order dated 12.4.1994 @ Rs. 200/- per month and earlier enhanced to Rs. 300/- by order dated 26.7.1996 under Section 127, Cr.P.C. Criminal Revision No. 3228 of 2007 has been filed by Mahesh Chandra Dwivedi for setting aside the order dated 19.7.2007 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Kanpur in Misc. Case No. 35 of 2006 whereby the rejected the application filed by husband Mahesh Chandra Dwivedi against Smt. Manorama under Section 127, Cr.P.C. for cancelling the order dated 26.7.1996 whereby the maintenance amount was enhanced from Rs. 200/- to Rs. 300/- per month under Section 127, Cr.P.C. Since these two revisions arise between the same parties and the facts are common they have been heard together and are being decided by one order.

2. I have heard Sri Bal Mukund, learned Counsel for Smt.














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top