SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(All) 2083

RAJES KUMAR
RAJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
N.L. Pandey for the Petitioner; Ashok Mehta, S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Rajes Kumar, J.—Heard Sri N.L. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 and Sri Ashok Mehta appears on behalf of respondent No. 5.

2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the letter dated 7th January, 2008 issued by the Joint Director of Education, Meerut addressed to District Inspector of Schools, Meerut by which it has been informed that the Regional Level Committee has approved the election dated 27th October, 2007 in which Sri Ravindra Singh was elected as President and Sri Bijendra Singh was elected as Manager on the basis of the report and recommendation of the District Inspector of Schools, Meerut.

3. In the array of the party, the petitioner claimed to be the life member of the General Body of the institution but in the body of the petition there is no mention that the petitioner is the life member of the General Body.

4. Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the writ petition filed by individual member challenging the letter dated 7th January, 2008 is not maintainable in view of the catena of decisions of this Court, namely, Bhagwan Kau








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top