SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(All) 2832

VIJAY KUMAR VERMA
SATISH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Amit Daga for the Applicants; Bhaskar Mall, A.G.A. for the Opposite Parties.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Vijay Kumar Verma, J.—By means of this application under Section 482, Cr.P.C. of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’), the applicants (1) Satish Kumar, (2) Shree Pal, (3) Smt. Kamlesh and (4) Smt. Gyanu @ Gyanwati have invoked inherent jurisdiction of this Court for quashing of the proceedings of criminal case No. 950 of 2007 (State v. Satish Kumar and others) under Section 498A, 323, 504, 506, I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P. Act arising out of crime No. 527 of 2005, P.S. Vijay Nagar, Ghaziabad pending in the Court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 2, Ghaziabad.

2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts leading to the filing of the application under Section 482, Cr.P.C., in brief, are that marriage of applicant No. 1 Satish Kumar and opposite party No. 2 Smt. Kavita took place on 15.4.2001, but subsequently some misunderstanding and disputes were developed between the couple, as a result of which Smt. Kavita lodged an FIR against the applicants at P.S. Vijay Nagar (Ghaziabad), where a case under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506, I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P. Act was registered at crime No. 527 of 2005. After investigation, one charge-sheet against the applic















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top