SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 699

SUNIL AMBWANI
RAM PRATAP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Kaushal Kishore Mishra for the Petitioner; S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Sunil Ambwani, J.—Heard Shri Kaushal Kishore Mishra for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel appears for the respondents. The affidavits have been exchanged. With the consent of parties, the writ petition was finally heard and is finally decided at the admission stage.

2. The petitioner was serving as ‘Seenchpal’ in the office of Executive Engineer, Fatehpur Division, Lower Ganga Canal, Fatehpur. For the purposes of discipline and conduct, his services are governed by the Uttar Pradesh Government Servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1999, notified under Article 309 of the Constitution of India.

3. In the year 1999, in an incident in which one Raju was murdered, the petitioner, along with other accused namely Chhatrapal; Virendra and Ramanand arrested under Sections 302/149/147, IPC. They were granted bail. The petitioner along with other accused was charge sheeted and was tried in Sessions Trial No. 287 of 2000 in which he was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 10,000/- under Section 302/149, IPC, and further with a three year’s rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 2,000/- under Section 147, IPC. All the sentences were directed by


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top