KRISHNA MURARI, S.RAFAT ALAM
MASHOOQ AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
By the Court.—This is intra Court appeal.
2. We have heard Shri Chandra Jee Yadav, learned counsel for the appellant and Shri P.K. Mukherji for respondent Nos. 3 and 4.
3. Writ Petition No. 46532 of 2008 was filed by M/s. Bharat Pumps & Compressors Ltd. challenging the award of the labour Court, wherein the conditional order dated 8.9.2008 staying the execution of the award was passed. The Court while passing the order dated 8.9.2008 observed that copy of the award filed alongwith the writ petition does not bear any date, but proceeded after a certified copy of the award bearing the date 2.3.2007 was produced. The appellant-workman alleging certain incorrect statement with regard to the date of the award made in the writ petition, which amounts to practising fraud upon the Court, filed contempt petition being Contempt Application No. 3685 of 2008, which was dismissed vide order dated 23.10.2008 on the finding that the fact that copy of the award did not bear any date, was in the notice of the writ Court and the workman, who was duly represented before the writ Court, himself pointed out the anomaly as well and produced the certified copy of the award bearing the date and no m
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.