SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 2973

POONAM SRIVASTAVA
RAVI AGRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
ANIL KUMAR VERMA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
M.A. Qadeer and Shamim Ahmad for the Petitioner; K. Ajit for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Mrs. Poonam Srivastava, J.—Heard Sri M.A. Qadeer, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Shamim Ahmad, counsel for tenant/petitioner and Sri K. Ajit, counsel for contesting landlord/respondent.

2. Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged. The counsels for respective parties agree that the instant petition may be decided finally at the stage of admission itself.

3. The dispute relates to a shop measuring 8 x 10 situated at Taxi Stand Road, Civil Lines, Rampur. Petitioner is a tenant of the said shop at the rate of Rs. 400/- per month. Plaintiff/respondent gave a notice for demanding arrears of rent on the ground of default in payment of rent as well as material alteration in the shop in dispute on 20.7.2002. After expiry of period of notice, S.C.C. Suit No. 12 of 2002 was instituted for recovery of arrears of rent and damages.

4. The Judge Small Causes Court decreed suit on 24.3.2007 in favour of plaintiff, which was challenged in S.C.C. Revision No. 21 of 2007. The judgment and decree of the Judge Small Causes Court was confirmed in S.C.C. Revision, same was dismissed by Additional District Judge, Court No. 2, Rampur, vide judgment and order dated 4.11.2008. Bo

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top