Hon’ble Shri Narayan Shukla, J.—Since in both the writ petitions common question of facts and law are involved, the same are being disposed of by following common judgment.

2. Heard Ms. Samiksha Verma, petitioner (in person) and Mr. Upendra Nath Mishra, learned counsel for the Lucknow University, Lucknow.

3. Through writ petition No. 5601 (M/S) of 2005 the petitioner has sought the following relief :

“(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 20.10.2005 passed by the respondent No. 2 as contained in Annexure 2 to this writ petition.

(b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to give her admission for the LLB. three years academic course after being holding proper procedure either by counseling or any other procedure, which is legal and just.

(c) Issue any other order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

(d) Allow the writ petition with costs."

Through writ petition No. 3196 (M/S) of 2008 the petitioner has sought the following relief :

“(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding