SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 1224

VIRENDRA SINGH, ASHOK BHUSHAN
RAJ KUMAR GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Manish Goyal for the Petitioner; Shashi Nandan, Siddharth Srivastava, S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Virender Singh, J.—This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner with the prayer that a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dated 18.02.2010 passed by respondent No. 3 District Registrar/ Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue) Firozabad be issued and a writ in the nature of prohibition restraining respondent Nos. 4 and 5, the Sub Registrar, Sadar and Tehsildar, Sadar Firozabad, respectively from making any changes in the registered instrument in Book No. 3, Section 46, Serial. No. 150 at Page 345-356, the Will executed by the testator Late Krishna Murari Gupta, be issued and a further writ in the nature of prohibition restraining the respondent Nos. 2 to 5 from lodging any criminal prosecution against the petitioner be also issued.

2. We have heard Sri Manish Goyal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Shashi Nandan, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Siddhartha Srivastava for respondent No. 6 and the learned Standing Counsel on behalf of the respondents 1 to 5.

3. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that the father of the petitioner and grand father of the respondent No. 6 Aman Gupta, had executed a registered




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top