SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 1299

[2010(4) ADJ 402 (DB)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : SUNIL AMBWANI AND K.N. PANDEY, JJ.
GOVERNING BODY, CHRIST CHURCH COLLEGE, KANPUR ....Petitioner
Versus
VICE-CHANCELLOR AND OTHERS ....Respondents
(Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 16350 of 2010, decided on 16th April, 2010)

Advocates:
Counsel :
Navin Sinha, A.D. Saunders for the Petitioner; U.N. Sharma, Neeraj Tiwari for V.C. (Respondent-1); Shashi Nandan, Ankush Tandon for the Respondents-2 and 3.

Headnote:Termination—Teachers—Misconduct by Governing Body of a minority college by a resolution—Sent to Vice-Chancellor for approval—Vice-Chancellor rejected proposal and directed college to permit respondent teachers to perform their duties and to pay their salaries—V.C. also held that an unrecognised management cannot terminate services of any teacher of affiliated College—Challenged by College—V.C. misdirected himself in proceeding to enquire into allegations and validity of C.O.M. on ground that its recognition had expired—University, unlike powers given to educational authorities in U.P. Intermediate Education Act, has no authority to question recognition, once it is granted, or to get recognition renewed, on every elections or change in composition of C.O.M. of society, unless there is a dispute and there a rival claimant to management—V.C. has not only acted illegally and has erred in refusing to exercise his powers under Section 35(2) of U.P. State Universities Act, 1973, but he has also violated fundamental rights of petitioner-College, a minority institution under Article 30(1) of Constitution—Petitioners has established that instant case is an exception to general rule of relegating petitioner to avail alternative remedies provided under Act—Impugned order, set aside—And V.C. directed to reconsider report of Governing Body of petitoners’ College, vide its proposal, dated 25.2.2010 for approval of termination order strictly in accordance with powers vested in him under Section 35(2) of Act of 1973 and to consider matter afresh. [U.P. State Universities Act, 1973—Section 35(2), 38(2); Constitution of India—Article 30(1)]. [Paras 9, 11, 12, 24 to 30]

       

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—The Governing Body, Christ Church College, Kanpur has filed this writ petition through its Secretary Dr. Pervez E. Deen challenging the order of Prof. H.K. Sehgal, Vice-Chancellor, Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj University, Kanpur, rejecting the proposal of termination of services of Dr. Misbahul Islam and Dr. (Mrs.) P. Richards, the teachers of the College under Section 35 (2) of the U.P. State Universities Act, 1973 (in short, ‘the Act).

2. We have heard Shri Navin Sinha, Senior advocate assisted by Shri A.D. Saunders for the petitioner. Shri Umesh Narain Sharma, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Neeraj Tiwari appears for the Vice-Chancellor-respondent No. 1. Shri Shashi Nandan, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Ankush Tandon has entered appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Both the respondents gave statements on 5.4.2010, that they do not want to file counter affidavit and that the writ petition may be decided on the basis of documents annexed to the writ petition.

3. The ‘Christ Church College, Kanpur’ a post graduate degree college, is a minority institution, run and managed by the Christ Church College Society (in short, ‘the Society) registered on 30th May, 1956 with the Registrar, Joint Stock Companies, Uttar Pradesh, Registration No. 91 of 1956-57, for the objects as set out in its ‘Memorandum’ and with primary purpose to give Christian Education and opportunities for teaching, witness, and worship, according to the faith, doctrine and practices of the Church of North India and more especially to Christian staff and students; to maintain sufficient staff to preserve and strengthen the Christian Character and purposes of the institution; to give education particularly to the people of Kanpur etc. and other allied purposes. Clause 3 of the Memorandum provides that the Bishop of Agra for the time being, or his duly appointed Commissary; the Secretary of the College Council of the CNI College in UP; the Principal of Christ Church College, Kanpur for the time being; a nominee of the Executive Committee of the Diocese of Agra, for the time being; the Principal Officer Incharge of the Kanpur Branch Office of the Agra Diocesan Trust Association for the time being; two persons to be nominated by the Bishop, were to be the ex-officio members of the Society and will constitute the first Governing Body of the Society. The other members of the Society other than the ex-officio members of the Society, were to be such individuals who may be elected as members of the Governing Body of the Society, at the Annual General Meeting of the Society, or by the Governing Body of the Society but such members shall cease to be members of the Society when they cease to be members of the Governing Body.

4. Clause 6 of the Memorandum provides that the business and affairs of the Society shall be managed by a Governing Body of not less than seven and not more than fifteen members to be constituted with the Governing Body, the Bishop of the Diocese or his duly appointed Commissary or their duly appointed nominee for the time being; the Principal of the College for the time being; the Vice-Principal of the College for the time being. In case there is no Vice-Principal, then the Warden of the Hostel for the time being; two representative of the Teachers of Christ Church College to be chosen as prescribed by the University Statutes (but not a member of the Society and four to eleven members elected by the Society in its Annual General meeting of whom at least three (excluding the Bishop and Principal) shall be from amongst such ex-officio members of the Society, as are not members of the staff of Christ Church College for the time being. Any casual vacancy among members of the Governing Body is provided to be filled in Clause 7 by the Governing Body, but any person so chosen shall retain his office only until the next meeting of the Society when the vacancy shall be filled by the Society. The Clause-8 provides that no act












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top