SATISHCHANDRA, K. C. AGRAWAL
Rajbali – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
K. C. AGARWAL, J. :- These two petitions filed under Art.226 of the Constitution challenge the validity of the notifications under Ss.4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act dated 26th Sept. 1981, and 5th Oct, 1981, respectively. These notifications had been issued acquiring 219.49 acres land of village Khalilabad, District Basti, for the purpose of planned Industrial Development of district Basti through U.P. State Industrial Corporation Limited. Kanpur.
2. Challenging the validity of the aforesaid notifications learned Counsel for the petitioner first urged that as the purpose for which the acquisition was intended had not been clearly specified, the notifications were invalid. We do not agree with this submission. The notifications have clearly stated the purpose of acquisition, that is, the planned Industrial Development of district Basti. It was not necessary to mention in these notifications the various industries which were intended to be set up. It could not be possible at the time of issuing of the notifications under Ss.4 and 6 to specify area which would be assigned to each individual industrialist for setting up a particular industry in which he may be interested. T
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.