SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(All) 718

K.N.SINGH, K.M.DAYAL
State of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Dharam Singh Mahra – Respondent


Advocates:
S.N. Upadhyaya and Standing Counsel, for Appellants; M.M. Pant, for Respondent.

Judgement

K.M. DAYAL, J.:- The present first appeal has been filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh and another against the judgment and decree dated 24-11-1980, passed by Sri U.P.S. Kushwaha, Civil Judge, Nainital, in Suit No. 41 of 1980. Dharam Singh the plaintiff respondent filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,30,000/- against the appellants on 14-8-1980. The suit was ordered to be registered after Munsarims report and summonses were issued to the defendants under O.V, Rule 1 of Civil P.C. fixing 23-9-1980 for filing Written Statement and 30-9-1980, for settlement of issues. On 23-9-1980, an application, 19-D, was moved by the District Government Counsel, (Civil), on behalf of the State of Uttar Pradesh, praying four months time to file the written statement. The defendants application was partly allowed on payment of Rs. 10/- as costs. He was directed to file the written statement by 3-11-1980. On 3-11-1980 again an application 21-D was filed by the defendants counsel for time to file written statement. No. specific period was mentioned in the application but it was mentioned that the written statement had been prepared and sent to the Legal Remembrancer for his approval. The plainti














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top