ORDER : - These two petitions are being disposed of by a common judgment as the controversies involved therein are the same. Both the petitions are directed against concurrent orders passed by the courts below upholding a compromise and rejecting the various objections taken by the petitioner as to the validity thereof. The courts below have found that the compromise in question was validly reached between the parties and that the suit filed by Smt. Lakhpati being suit No.47 of 1968 against the petitioner and one Uma Shanker was rightly disposed of in terms of that compromise. The petitions arise out of two suits namely suit No.47 of 1968 and Suit No.30 of 1970. The latter suit was filed by the petitioner against Uma Shanker aforesaid. As a result of the compromise both these suits have been disposed of on terms thereof.

2. The petitioner was defendant No.2 in suit No.47 of 1968. Uma Shanker was defendant No.1 in that suit. The suit was filed by Smt. Lakhpati for cancellation of a sale deed Dt. 4-10-1963 said to have been executed by her in favour of Rama Shanker. The plaint allegations were that the plaintiffs husband Tapeshwari was the sole proprietor of the plots in suit which w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document