SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(All) 278

M.P.MEHROTRA
Amir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Om Prakash – Respondent


Advocates:
Lakshmi Bhari, for Applicant, Prakash Gupta, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT :- This first appeal from order is directed against the order passed by the lower appellate court rejecting an application whereby the present appellant sought leave of the said court to be brought on record as appellant no. 2 in the appeal which was pending in the said court. The brief facts involved in the appeal are these:

One Bindeshwari Singh filed Suit No. 33 of 1968 in the Court of the Civil Judge. He was the sole plaintiff in the suit and it seems that he impugned certain gift deeds. The suit was dismissed and an appeal was filed in the lower appellate court. Bindeshweri Singh was the appellant and the defendants were impleaded as respondents. During the pendency of the said appeal, Bindeshwari Singh died and his son Musafir Singh moved an application for being substituted in the place of the deceased appellant. That application was allowed and Musafir Singh was brought on record in the place of the deceased appellant.

2. The present appellant before me, Amir Singh, applied in the lower appellate court for being impleaded as appellant No. 2. In support of his application which purposed to be under O. 22 R. 10 read with S. 151 C.P.C., he filed an affidavit. He relied







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top