GOPINATH
The State of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Mahant Avaidh Nath – Respondent
2. Plaintiffs case was that there was a temple of Sri Gorakhnath in Gorakhpur, that the plaintiff was the Mahant of the temple, that the plots in dispute were groves planted by the temple in order to provide firewood for the maintenance of a perpetual fire (Akhand Dhuni) of Sri Gorakh Nath Ji and for use of every day Bhandara of Sadhus in the temple. The plaintiff-respondent claimed to be the Bhumidhar in possession of the plots in dispute. The Forest Department of the State, it was alleged illegally issued a notification declaring the said plots as Reserved Forest. Plaintiffs case was that the said plots did not constitute a forest. They were groves under the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act and could not be declared a reserved forest under the Forest Act, (hereinafter referred to as the Act). I
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.