HARISWARUP, GOPINATH
Lakhpati Singh – Appellant
Versus
Raghunath Singh – Respondent
ORDER :- This petition has been filed for quashing the proceedings under Section 144, C.P.C. on the ground that a notification under Section 4 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act has been issued in respect of the village in which the land in dispute lies.
2. Learned counsel has contended that after the trial court's decree it Was put into execution and possession was obtained by the petitioner. Thereafter an appeal had been filed by the judgement-debtor. During the pendency of the appeal consolidation proceedings commenced. The appeal and the suit accordingly abated under Section 5 of the Consolidation of Holdings Act. The judgement-debtors thereupon applied under Section 144, C.P.C., for restitution. The court below has directed the restitution. The petitioner has now challenged that order through this petition.
3. Once the suit has abated under law the effect will be that everything done by the Court in that suit will have to be reversed and the parties will have to be put back to the same position in which they were on the date of the institution of the suit. The purpose of Section 144, C.P.C. is exactly the same. Once the suit has abated no party can take advantage
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.