K.B.ASTHANA
Kiran Bahadur Singh – Appellant
Versus
Harikrishan Mathur – Respondent
2. Sri Gopal Behari, learned counsel appearing for the defendant appellant agitated a large number of questions of law in support of the appeal, but I think for the purpose of deciding this appeal I need not notice all the grounds urged in support of the appeal except the one on the question of the defendant tenant having failed to pay the arrears of rent demanded by the plaintiffs-landlords by a notice under Section 3(1)(a) of the U.P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947, as my answer to that question would be conclusive of the appeal.
3. Admittedly the plaintiff land-lords who are real brothers inherited the house in dispute from their ancestors, and so did the defendant tenant inherited the tenancy from his predecessors, father and uncle. It is further admitted that beside the defendant tenant his brother is also living in the house in suit. On 15-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.