SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(All) 265

K.B.ASTHANA
Kiran Bahadur Singh – Appellant
Versus
Harikrishan Mathur – Respondent


Advocates:
Gopal Behari and S.N. Agrawal, for Appellant; K.C. Agrawal, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT :- This is a defendant tenant's appeal from a decree of the appellate Court evicting him from a house in suit and awarding arrears of rent and damages in favour of the plaintiffs land-lords. The trial Court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit but the lower appellate Court by reversing the trial Court decreed the suit.

2. Sri Gopal Behari, learned counsel appearing for the defendant appellant agitated a large number of questions of law in support of the appeal, but I think for the purpose of deciding this appeal I need not notice all the grounds urged in support of the appeal except the one on the question of the defendant tenant having failed to pay the arrears of rent demanded by the plaintiffs-landlords by a notice under Section 3(1)(a) of the U.P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947, as my answer to that question would be conclusive of the appeal.

3. Admittedly the plaintiff land-lords who are real brothers inherited the house in dispute from their ancestors, and so did the defendant tenant inherited the tenancy from his predecessors, father and uncle. It is further admitted that beside the defendant tenant his brother is also living in the house in suit. On 15-

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top