LAKSHMIPRASAD, K.B.SRIVASTAVA, JAGDISH SAHAI
Shankar Hari Nandan Ahir – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
JAGDISH SAHAI, J. :- The Criminal revisions and the special appeal mentioned above have been laid before this Bench for the decision of the question whether the Criminal revisions are competent to be heard at Lucknow and whether Writ Petition No. 193 of 1968 out of which special appeal no. 117 of 1969 arises was wrongly rejected by Sahgal, J. on the ground that the Lucknow Bench could not entertain it.
2. The Criminal Revision No. 396 of 1966 is directed against the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Lucknow, dismissing the appeal filed by the applicant challenging his conviction under Ss. 120-B and 420, I. P. C. and the sentences awarded under those provisions by the Special Magistrate posted at Lucknow. The special Magistrate whose court is located at Lucknow and who tried the case has been specially empowered to try all such cases within the State of Uttar Pradesh. This Court has issued notice to the applicant in Criminal Revision No. 396 of 1966 as to why his sentence should not be enhanced. The proceedings arising out of that notice have been separately numbered as Criminal Revision No. 316 of 1968.
3. Writ Petition No. 193 of 1968 was filed by Fateh B
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.