SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(All) 16

JAGDISH SAHAI, YASHODANANDAN, R.L.GULATI
Narendra Bahadur – Appellant
Versus
Shanker Lal – Respondent


Advocates:
K.C. Saksena, for Applicant; A.N. Kaul, for Respondent.

Judgement

JAGDISH SAHAI, J. :- In the application No. 116 of 1966 made by defendant-petitioner under Art. 133 (1) (b) and (c) read with Art. 135 of the Constitution of India, the questions raised were whether in the circumstances of the case a certificate could be granted under Cls. (b) and (c) of Art. 133 (1) of the Constitution. Mr. Saksena learned counsel for the defendant-petitioner conceded before the Division Bench before which the matter had originally came up that Cl. (a) does not apply.

2. The facts giving rise to this application in short are that the plaintiff-opposite party filed suit No. 54 of 1946 in the Court of Munsif (City) Saharanpur for the possession over a plot of land situate in the city of Saharanpur after demolition of certain constructions made by the defendant-petitioner. The suit for the purpose of jurisdiction was valued at Rs. 1500 in the plaint.

3. In the written statement, it was pleaded that the value of the constructions made by defendant-petitioner was Rs. 7000.

4. The learned Munsif held that the correct valuation of the constructions made by defendant petitioner on the land in dispute was Rs. 6,000.

5. Mr. Saksena contended before the Division Bench














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top