SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(All) 29

R.S.PATHAK, M.H.BEG, R.L.GULATI
Commissioner, Sales Tax, U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Ram Bilas Ram Gopal – Respondent


Advocates:
Standing Counsel, for Appellant.

Judgement

PATHAK, J. :- The assessee deals in foodgrains and oil-seeds at Maudaha in the district of Hamirpur. He supplied food-grains to the Regional Food Controller under the U. P. Wheat Procurement (Levy) Order, 1959. The turnover of food-grains so supplied was assessed to sales tax under the U. P. Sales Tax Act. On appeal by the assessee, the Assistant Commissioner (Judicial) Sales Tax, excluded that turnover from assessment. The Additional Judge (Revisions) Sales Tax upheld the exclusion, holding that the supplies effected by the assessee to the Regional Food Controller did not amount to a sale for the purpose of Section 2(h) of the U. P. Sales Tax Act. At the instance of the Commissioner of Sales Tax, the Additional Judge (Revisions) has referred the following questions:-

(1) Whether the sales made to the Regional Food Controller under the U. P. Procurement (Levy) Order, 1959, are sales within the meaning of "Sales" under Section 2(h) of the U. P. Sales Tax Act?

(2) Whether in the circumstances of the case the assessees are liable to pay sales tax on the sales made to the Regional Food Controller under the provisions of the U. P. Wheat Procurement (Levy) Order, 1959?"

The case




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top