G. K. MITTER, K. N. WANCHOO, K. S. HEGDE, R. S. BACHAWAT, V. RAMASWAMI
Andhra Sugars LTD. – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent
Judgement
BACHAWAT, J. :- In all these writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution, the petitioners ask for an order declaring that Section 21 of the Andhra Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1961 (Andhra Pradesh Act No.45of 1961) is unconstitutional and ultravires and a direction prohibiting the respondents from levying tax under Section 21 and to refund the tax already collected. Section 21 of the Act is in these terms :
"21 (1) The Government may, by notification, levy a tax at such rate not exceeding five rupees per metric tonne as may be prescribed on the purchase of cane required for use, consumption or sale in a factory.
(2) The Government may, by notification, remit in whole or in part such tax in respect of cane used or intended to be used in a factory for any purpose specified in such notification.
(3) The Government may, by notification, exempt from the payment of tax under this Section-
(a) any new factory which, in the opinion of the Government has substantially expanded, to the extent of such expansion, for a period not exceeding two years from the date of completion of the expansion.
(4) The tax payable under sub-sec. (1) shall he levied and
Considered : Diamond Sugar Mills Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Applied : Automobile Transport (Rajasthan) Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan
referred to : Indian Steel and Wire Products Ltd. v. State of Madras
Firm A. T. Mehtab Majid and Co. v. State of Madras
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.