SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(All) 73

W.BROOME, H.C.P.TRIPATHI, S.D.SINGH
Zila Parishad, Muzaffarnagar – Appellant
Versus
Jugal Kishore Ram Swarup – Respondent


Advocates:
P.C. Gupta, for Appellants.

Judgement

BROOME, J. :- The following question has been referred to this Bench for decision :

"Whether clause (f) of sub-section (1) of section 14, U. P. Town Areas Act, 1914 is valid."

2. S. 14 of the said Act enumerates the various taxes that may be imposed by a Town Area Committee; and clause (f) of this section relates specifically to the levy of circumstances and property tax. This provision was introduced in the U. P. Town Areas Act by an amending Act (U. P. Act XXIII of 1950), which came into force in July 1950. Such a tax was not being levied by Town Areas before the commencement of the Constitution and consequently cannot be saved by Art. 277. The question therefore arises whether the amendment conferring the power on Town Area Committees to levy this tax was within the legislative competence of the State Legislature. The argument advanced by learned counsel for the appellant in this connection is twofold. Firstly, it is contended that circumstances and property tax is essentially a form of income tax, which is a subject exclusively within the jurisdiction of Parliament, being covered by item no. 82 of List I of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. And secondly it is urg





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top