SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(All) 41

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Mootham, C.J., and Srivastava, J.
WESTERN U.P.ELECTRIC POWER AND SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. - Appellant
Versus
TOWN AREA - Respondents
Civil Misc. Writ 1266 Of 1955
Decided On : 02/01/1957

Advocates Appeared:
GYAN PRAKASH, S.N.MISRA

SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for the issue of a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other suitable writ, order or direction quashing the order dated the 5th september, 1955 and all proceedings relating to the assessment of the applicant for the years 1952-53, 1953-54 and 1954-55 in respect of circumstances and property tax.

( 2 ) THE applicant is an incorporated company having a branch at Jaswantnagar in the district of etawah. Its head office is located at Delhi. It carries on the business of supplying electricity at several places including Jaswantnagar. The town of Jaswantnagar is situate within the jurisdiction of the Town Area Committee of that place constituted under the U. P. Town Areas act (Act No. II of 1914 ). Holding that the applicant was liable to pay circumstances and property tax, the Town Area committee of Jaswantnagar has assessed the applicant to a tax of Rs. 250 per year for the three years 1952-53, 1953-54 and 1954-55. In these years the earned gross income of the applicant has been held to be Rs. 30,630-11-0, Rs. 30, III-5-3 and Rs. 29,993-9-3 respectively. The applicant objected to the assessment on the ground that during the years in question it had no income and had on the contrary suffered losses. It had, therefore, no taxable income in those years and could not consequently be assessed to any circumstances and property tax. The objection was not upheld by the Town Area Committee. An appeal was filed before the District Magistrate and was decided by the Sub-Divisional magistrate of Etawah to whom it was transferred. He too rejected the appeal. The applicant has, therefore, come up to this Court with the contention that its assessment to circumstances and property tax, is illegal and without jurisdiction.

( 3 ) THE main argument put forward in support of the contention is that the power to tax income vests only in the Parliament. The rules framed by the State Government authorising Town Areas to tax a person on his gross income, must, therefore, be held to be ultra vires and the assessment of the applicant on the basis of gross income is consequently illegal.

( 4 ) SECTION 14 of the U. P. Town Areas Act, Sub-section (1) (leaving out the unnecessary words)reads as below:

"subject to any general rules or special orders of the State Government in this behalf, the taxes which a Committee may impose are the following; clause (f ). A tax on persons assessed according to their circumstances and property riot exceeding such rate and subject to such limitations and restrictions as may be prescribed:"


( 5 ) SECTION 39 of the Act authorises the State Government to make rules applicable to all or any town Areas for carrying out the purposes of the Act. Clause (II) of Sub-section (2) of this section lays down that in particular and without prejudice to the generality of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) rules framed may relate to the limitations, restrictions and rate subject to which the circumstances and property tax shall be levied under Section 14.

( 6 ) RULES framed under Section 39 (2) (II) include

"2. The tax shall be assessed on every person on whom it is imposed in two separate parts, namely (1) on his circumstances and (2) on the property, if any, owned by him, and the aggregate of the sums to be determined on both the counts shall constitute the total composite amount payable by him as circumstances and property tax: provided that nothing shall render it irregular to assess a person on only one of the two counts aforementioned if he does not fulfil the conditions for liability in respect of that count on which he is not assessed. 3. (1) The tax assessed on the circumstances of an assessee may be imposed on any person residing or carrying on business within the limits of the town area: provided that such person has so resided or carried on business for a total period of at least six months in the year of assessment. (2) No tax shall be impose





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top