J.SAHAI, S.CHANDRA
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Usman – Respondent
SATISH CHANDRA, J. : This is an appeal by the defendant, the Union of India. It is directed against an order of the learned Additional Civil Judge, Jhansi, granting an application under Sections 8 and 20, Arbitration Act.
2. Mohammad Usman, the plaintiff-respondent, on 8-3-1945 entered it to a contract with the Union of India to supply meat to the Military Regiment between 1-1-1945 and 31-3-1946. The plaintiff alleged that he made the requisite supplies, but was not fully paid. According to him, a sum of Rs. 8,38,994/10/6 was still payable to him by the Union of India. He made several representations to the appellant for payment, as also for arbitration of the dispute by the General Officer Commanding in Chief, Headquarters, Eastern Command, Lucknow, who was the officer named in the
contract as arbitrator to settle the differences arising between the parties under the arbitration clause of the contract. By his letter dated 10-7-1958, which was served on the plaintiff on 15-7-1958, the G.O.C. In Chief, Headquarters Eastern Command, Lucknow, informed the plaintiff that there was no valid reason for holding the arbitration in the case. The plaintiff on 20-4-1961 issued a notice
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.