SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(All) 43

J.SAHAI, S.CHANDRA
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Usman – Respondent


Advocates:
Shanti Bhushan, for Appellant; G. N. Kunzru and Raja Ram Agarwal, for Respondent.

Judgement

SATISH CHANDRA, J. : This is an appeal by the defendant, the Union of India. It is directed against an order of the learned Additional Civil Judge, Jhansi, granting an application under Sections 8 and 20, Arbitration Act.

2. Mohammad Usman, the plaintiff-respondent, on 8-3-1945 entered it to a contract with the Union of India to supply meat to the Military Regiment between 1-1-1945 and 31-3-1946. The plaintiff alleged that he made the requisite supplies, but was not fully paid. According to him, a sum of Rs. 8,38,994/10/6 was still payable to him by the Union of India. He made several representations to the appellant for payment, as also for arbitration of the dispute by the General Officer Commanding in Chief, Headquarters, Eastern Command, Lucknow, who was the officer named in the

contract as arbitrator to settle the differences arising between the parties under the arbitration clause of the contract. By his letter dated 10-7-1958, which was served on the plaintiff on 15-7-1958, the G.O.C. In Chief, Headquarters Eastern Command, Lucknow, informed the plaintiff that there was no valid reason for holding the arbitration in the case. The plaintiff on 20-4-1961 issued a notice












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top