SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 86

[2011(2) ADJ 681]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : SUDHIR AGARWAL, J.
HEMANT KUMAR AND ANOTHER …..Petitioners
Versus
Dr. BHIM RAO AMBEDKAR, AGRA AND OTHERS ….Respondents
(Civil Misc. Writ Petition Nos. 41107, 41113, 41115, 41116, 41118, 41121, 41123, 41126, 41128, 41130, 41132, 41134, 41136, 41138, 41139, 41141, 41142, 44455, 44456, 44457 of 2008 and No. 5333 of 2009,
decided on 11th January, 2011)

Advocates:
Counsel :
Ranjit Saxena for the Petitioner; Sanjay Kumar Singh (S.C.-B.R. Ambedkar University, Agra) for the Respondents.

Headnote:(A) Appointment—Class III and IV employees of University—Cancellation of—Legality—Whether selection as a whole can be said to be tainted and victiated in law justifying its cancellation in enterity—And whether petitioners were entitled for show-cause notice, or opportunity before cancellation of entire selection, which in effect, resulted in termination of service of petitioners—Considering nature and conduct of respondent-3 and manner in which he has been able to influence members of Selection Committee, decision of Executive Council upheld—Petitioners having been permitted to participate in fresh selection without applying afresh, are already protected by university—There was several irregularities and entire selection was vitiated in law, resorting to fresh selection—Thus, no interference and no relief can be given to petitioners. [Paras 18, 50, 63 and 64]

       (B) Appointment—Selection—Irregularities, if any, Committed in selection, if are such a nature as to taint entire salection, without clearly identifying individuals, decision of authorities would not be interfered by Court, if they decide to cancel entire selection—But where allegations of irregularities are of individual nature and identificable, it would not be appropriate to cancel entire selection. [Para 31]

       (C) Judicial review—Scope and applicability. [Paras 33 and 34]

       (D) Words and Phrases—Word "Corruption"—Meaning of.

        [Paras 57 and 58]

       

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—This bunch of writ petitions relates to cancellation of appointment of Class III and IV employees of Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar University, Agra (hereinafter referred to as ‘’University’). The writ petitions No. 41113 of 2008, 41116 of 2008, 41118 of 2008, 41121 of 2008, 41123 of 2008, 41126 of 2008, 41128 of 2008, 41130 of 2008 and 5333 of 2008 relate to Class III employees (hereinafter referred to as ‘’writ petitions-first set’) and rest of the writ petitions relate to Class IV employees (hereinafter referred to as ‘’writ petitions-second set’).

2. Before coming to the actual dispute, the submissions and its adjudication, it would be appropriate to place certain facts in brief as borne out from record.

3. An advertisement No. 1 of 2007, was published by University on 25.10.2007 in daily news paper ‘Amar Ujala’ and on 28.10.2007 in daily news paper ‘Aaj’ for making recruitment to various Class III and Class IV posts. We are concerned here with the recruitment made on the post of Routine Clerks and Peons (Parichar). Details from the said advertisement, in respect to the aforesaid two category of posts, is as under:

Designation Total number of posts Distribution in various

reserved categories

1 Routine Clerk 11 8 SC, 1 ST, 2 OBC

2 Parichar 17 15 SC, 2 ST

4. The last date for receiving Application Forms was 12.11.2007. Applications were required to be sent by speed-post/ registered-post only. Some other relevant conditions, as advertised, were as under:

^^;ksX;rk;sa% lewg x gsrq& 1&uSfRd fyfid@ MkVk ,sUVªh vkijsVj ek/;fed f’k{kk ifj"kn mRrj izns’k dh b.VjehfM,V ;k led{k ijh{kk mRrh.kZ gks] dEI;wVj ij fgUnh rFkk vaxzsth esa Vkbfiax dk Kku rFkk vuqHkoh vH;FkhZ dks ojh;rk nh tk;sxhA MkVk ,sUVªh vkijsVj ds fy, ,d o"kZ dEI;wVj fMIyksek mRrh.kZ gksuk vko’;d gSA^^

^^lewg ?k gsrq% twfu;j gkbZLdwy ¼d{kk vkB½ mRrh.kZ ,oa fgUnh Hkk"kk dk Kku] vuqHkoh dks ojh;rk

vko’;d funsZ’k% 1- vH;FkhZ dh vk;q 1 tqykbZ] 2007 dks 18 ls 35 o"kZ gksuh pkfg,A vk;qlhek esa vH;fFkZ;ksa dks fu;ekuqlkj vf/kdre ikWp dh NwV vuqeU; gksxhA^^

^^8- vkosnu i= dqylfpo MkW Hkhojko vEcsMdj fo’ofo+|ky;] vkxjk ds irs ij izsf"kr fd;k tk;A fyQkQs ds Åij Li"V :i ls ^^cSdykx HkrhZ gsrq vkosnu^^ vafdr fd;k tk;A^^

^^16- lewg ^x^ ds inksa ds fy, fyf[kr ijh{kk gksxh ,oa mlesa fu/kkZfjr vgZrk izkIr djus okys vH;fFkZ;ksa dks gh esfjV ds vk/kkj ij rduhdh ijh{kk&dEIwVj Vkbfiax@ lkekU; Vkbfiax] 'kkVZgSUM vkfn dh ijh{kk esa lfEefyr djk;k tk;sxkA lkekU; Vkbfiax ds fy;s vH;FkhZ dks Lo;a VkbijkbVj ykuk gksxkA^^

^^17- fyf[kr ijh{kk ds fy, 60 vad] rduhdh ijh{kk ds fy, 20 vad] 'kS{kf.kd miyfCèk;ksa ds fy;s vf/kdre 10 vad ¼izFke Js.kh 3] f}rh; Js.kh 2] r`rh; Js.kh 1] vU;&1 vad½ fu/kkZfjr gS rFkk lk{kkRdkj 10 vadks dk gksxkA p;u dqy 100 vadksa esa ls izkIr vadksa dh esfjV ds vkèkkj ij gksxkA^^


5. Later on a corrigendum was published in daily news paper ‘Amar Ujala’ dated 22.11.2007 extending the last date of submission of applications forms to 26.11.2007. Some other conditions were also notified as under:

^^1- MkW0 Hkhejko vEcsndj fo’ofo|ky; ¼rRle; vkxjk fo’ofo|ky;½] vkxjk dh dk;Zifj"kn cSBd fnukad] 28 Qjojh] 1987 ds ladYi 146@7-1 ds vuqlkj vuqlwfpr tkfr ,oa vuqlwfpr tutkfr vkfn vkjf{kr Js.kh ds inksa ij fu;qfDr gsrq mRrj izns’k ljdkj ds lqlaxr fu;eksa ,oa 'kklukns’ksa dk ikyu fd;k tk;sxkA

2- mRrj izns’k ¼mRrj izns’k yksd lsok vk;ksx ds {ks= ds ckgj½ lewg ^x^ ds inksa ij lhèkh HkrhZ dh izfdz;k fu;ekoyh] 2002 ,oa la’kks/ku fu;ekoyh] 2003 ds vuqlkj vc lewg ^x^ ds inksa ij p;u gsrq dksbZ fyf[kr ijh{kk vk;ksftr ugh dh tk;sxh] cfYd lHkh vH;fFkZ;ksa dh vfuok;Z vgZrk ds :i esa Vad.k ;k vk’kqfyfi vkSj Vad.k ijh{kk vk;ksftr dh tk;sxhA

3- p;u ds fy;s dqy izkIrkad ,d lkS vad ds gksaxs] ftlesa 'kSf{kd] ;ksX;rk ds fy;s vfèkdre 30 vad] NVuh’kqnk deZpkfj;ksa dks vf/kdre 15 vad rFkk dq’ky f[kykM+h dks vfèkdre 05 vad iznku fd;s tk;saxsA

4- lk{kkRdkj ipkl vadksa dk gksxkA ftlesa fo"k;@lkekU; Kku&10] vad] O;fDrRo fuèkkZj.k&20 vad rFkk vfHkO;fDr {kerk ds fy;s 20 vad fu/kkZf
























































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top