ANIL KUMAR
MOHD. ASLAM – Appellant
Versus
A. D. J. BARABANKI – Respondent
Hon’ble Anil Kumar, J.—Heard Sri Mohd. Arif Khan Senior Advocate assisted by Mohd. Adil Khan on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Bireshwar Nath, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. Controversy involved in the present case relates to a shop in mohalla Purana Bazar, Qasba Rudauli, district Barabanki and which petitioners are landlord, opposite party No. 2 Haji Ehsanul Haq is a tenant @ Rs. 10/- per month.
3. On 10.3.1981, petitioner moved an application under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act (hereinafter referred to as an ‘Act’) for release of the shop in question. In para 4, need as set up by the petitioners is to the effect that the shop in question is required for the purpose of doing business of selling readymade garments by petitioner No. 4 Mohd. Uzair.
4. Further in para-8 of the release application, it is stated that the tenant has one shop at purana bazar mohalla Khwaza Hall district Barabanki and one shop in Mohalla Katra district Barabanki from where the tenant alongwith his two sons are doing business so the need of applicant No. 4 to start the business from the shop in question is bona fide and genuine
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.