SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 1189

S.K.SINGH, SABHAJEET YADAV
MAHESH NARAIN GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
R.P. Tiwari for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—Heard Shri R.P. Tiwari learned counsel in support of this writ petition and learned Standing Counsel who appears for the respondents.

2. Prayer in this petition is for quashing the impugned order dated 26.11.2009 delivered to the petitioner on 17.12.2009 (Annexure No. 3 to the writ petition) passed by the State Government by which the disciplinary proceeding against the petitioner has been concluded by giving two directions i.e. (i) recovery of a particular amount by way of suit; (ii) deductions from the pensionary benefit to the tune of 10%.

3. As pleadings inter se parties are exchanged, both side requested for the hearing and decision and, thus, we have heard the matter.

For disposal of the writ petition, facts in brief will suffice.

4. Petitioner was in service in the Public Works Department and on 31.1.2006 he retired from the post of Executive Engineer. During the entire service period, the petitioner claims, that he was neither charge-sheeted nor any complaint against him ever came. It is only vide letter dated 5.5.2008, the petitioner was informed that pursuant to the order dated 6.6.2006, disciplinary proceedings against him has been initiated under C.S.






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top