SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 691

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Sunil Ambwani
RAM PRAKASH SINGH
Versus
STATE OF U P
Decided On : 02 March 2009
Civil Misc. Writ Petition Nos. 11394, 30321 and 45381 of 2008

Advocates Appeared:
ARUN KUMAR, Ashok Khare, MANOJ KUMAR, O.K.Singh, Vijai Mahendra,

Irregularities in the selection process must affect the entire selections to warrant cancellation, and victimization of an officer for maintaining secrecy in the procedure of selections is unjustified.

Headnote:

Selection Process - U.P. Procedure for Direct Recruitment for Group-C Posts - Rule 5 (3) (c) - Government Order dated 20. 7. 2002 - Entire selections cancelled based on irregularities in the selection process, including lack of transparency, award of marks, and dispatch of appointment letters.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners were declared successful for recruitment on reserved posts of clerks in the backlog vacancies. They sought to set aside the order cancelling the entire selections due to alleged irregularities.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the irregularities pointed out did not affect the entire selections and that the District Panchayat Raj Officer was victimized for maintaining secrecy in the procedure of selections.

Issues: Alleged irregularities in the selection process, cancellation of entire selections, and victimization of the District Panchayat Raj Officer.

Ratio Decidendi: Unless irregularities affect the entire selections, departments should not interfere with the selection process. Victimizing an officer for maintaining secrecy in the procedure of selections is unjustified.

Final Decision: The order cancelling the selections was set aside, and a writ of mandamus was issued to the respondents to issue the order of appointment and posting to the petitioners within a month. The petitioners were also awarded costs of the writ petition from the State Government.

SUNIL AMBWANI, J.

The seven writ petitioners in Writ Petition No. 11394 of 2008; the writ petitioner in Writ Petition No. 30321 of 2008 and the writ petitioner in Writ Petition No. 45381 of 2008 were declared successful amongst the 11 candidates for recruitment on the reserved posts of clerks in the backlog vacancies in the office of the District Panchayat Raj Adhikari, Basti. By these writ petitions they have prayed for direction to set aside the order of the Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj, Anubhag-1, Government of U. P. dated February 20th, 2008 by which entire selections have been cancelled and for consequential reliefs.

2. Shri Vijai Mahendra has appeared for petitioners in Writ Petition No. 11394 of 2008; Shri Arun Kumar has appeared for Shri Bharat Nath Yadav, the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 30321 of 2008 and Shri O. K. Singh for the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 45381 of 2008. Standing Counsel appears for State- respondents. Shri Ashok Khare, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Manoj Kumar has appeared for Shri R. B. Sahu, the then District Panchayat Raj Officer, Basti arrayed as respondent No. 6 in the writ petitions. The counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged. With the consent of the parties the matter was finally heard.

3. The U. P. Procedure for Direct Recruitment for Group-C Posts (Outside the Purview of the U. P. Public Service Commission) Rules, 2002 notified under Article 309 of the Constitution of India provides for the determination of vacancies and the procedure for direct recruitment to Group c posts in the State of U. P. The rules were amended by the first amendment to the Rules in the year 2003.

4. There were nine backlog vacancies of OBC category and two in the Scheduled Castes category in the office of the District Gram Panchayat Adhikari in Distt. Basti. The petitioners along with about 1600 candidates applied for selections in pursuance to the Advertisement for appointments. A list of the applicants was prepared in the descending order of quality point marks in order of merit, for being invited for interviews, which were held from 28. 12. 2007 to 16. 1. 2008 by a selection committee constituted in accordance with Rule 6 of the Rules of 2002, which included the Chairman, an officer belonging to the OBC category and one of Scheduled Castes category nominated by the District Magistrate.

5. The quality point marks were processed with the help of the computers. On the basis of the marks awarded by the Selection Committee in interviews 11 persons including the petitioners in their respective categories were declared to be selected. Four candidates including Km. Lalita Maurya were issued appointment letters, but their joining reports were not accepted. It appears that some complaints were made alleging unfairness in the process of selections. The source of the allegations made by the complainant have not been disclosed in the counter affidavit filed by Shri B. S. B. Kumar presently posted as District Panchayat Raj Officer, Basti.

6. A report was submitted by the members of the selection committee namely the Sub Divisional Officer, Basti Sadar; the District Samaj Kalyan Adhikari, Basti; the District Backward Class Welfare Officer, Basti and the District Employment Officer, Basti to the District Magistrate on 5th February, 2008 regarding some irregularities in the selections. It appears that before this report was submitted on 5th February, 2008, the District Magistrate had by his letter dated 4. 2. 2008 constituted a committee consisting of the Chief Development Officer of Basti as Chairman; Addl. District Magistrate (F & R), and the Chief Treasury Officer as the members and that on their report Shri Ram Babu Sahu, the then District Panchayat Raj Officerwas placed by the Addl. Director, Panchayat Raj, U. P. under suspension and that the entire selection was cancelled by the State Government giving rise to these writ petitions. Shri Anil Kumar Srivastava, Junior Clerk and Shri Ajay Pratap N

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top