SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(All) 354

A.N.VARMA, P.P.GUPTA
PIONEER TANNERIES AND GLUE WORKS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BHARAT JI AGRAWAL, R.K.Agrawal,

A. N. VARMA, J.

This group of petitions raises the much debated issue, viz. , whether section 3-AAAA of the U. P. Sales Tax Act, 1948, in pith and substance, imposes a tax on the consignment of goods and, therefore, beyond the legislative competence of the State Legislature.

Let us straightway have the provision before us in order to appreciate the controversy leaving out the explanation which is not relevant for our purpose. Section 3-AAAA reads thus :

" 3-AAAA. Liability to purchase tax on certain transaction.- Where any goods liable to tax at the point of sale to the consumer are sold to a dealer but in view of any provision of this Act no sales tax is payable by the seller and the purchasing dealer does not resell such goods within the State or in the course of inter-State trade or commerce, in the same form and condition in which he had purchased them, the purchasing dealer shall subject to the provisions of section 3, be liable to pay tax on such purchases at the rate at which tax is leviable on sale of such goods to the consumer within the State :

Provided that if it is proved to the satisfaction of the assessing authority that the goods so purchased had already been sub

































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top