SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(All) 835

R.K.SINGH, OM PRAKASH
TEJINDER KAUR – Appellant
Versus
INDER PAL SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Haider Zaidi,

OM PRAKASH, J.

This is a first appeal by the defendant-appellant against im pugned judgment and decree dated 10-5- passed by the Family Court, Kanpur Nagar appointing respondent- plaintiff as the guardian of Master Gagan Deep-Singh who was born from the union of the appel lant and respondent after their marraige having taken place on 3-6-1990 according to Sikh religion, which they belong to.

2. An application was made by the respondent husband under Section 10, read with Section 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act; 1890 (briefly, the Act of 1890) for secur ing custody of his son-Master Gagan Deep Singh stating that Gagan Deep was born on 14-4-1991, that his wife (appellant) left his house without any reason and started living with her parents from 20-11-1991; that the appellant filed a

habeas corpus petition seeking a direction against the respondent to present the minor son in the Court and for giving him into her custody; that by the order of the High Court, the child being below five years of age was given in the custody of the appellant; and that the cus tody of the child having completed the age of five years be given to him as he being the natural guardian has preferential right


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top