The constitutional mandate being that in our country all citizens would get not only social, economical and political justice but would also get equity of status and all opportunities, the questions involved in these nine writ petitions are whether the petitioners grievance that they stand discriminated is correct or not and whether the demotion orders dated 3-2-1995 against the petitioner working as Deputy Superintendents of Police is in the teeth of the directions of the Honble Supreme Court in Rana Randhit Singh v. State of U. P,, AIR 1989 SC 218, "that the respondents are directed to publish the final gradation list on the basis of the directions given above within six months hence, after granting confirmations in the cadre to the Stale of U. P. that the scheme in the rules shall be strictly followed and when a temporary or officiating appointment is made and the officer is not approved by the Public Service Commission, within one months of such non-approval, the candidate shall be revolted and would not be entitled to be continued m the promoted post of Deputy Superintendent of Police. "

2. By virtue of their promotions as Deputy Superintendent of Police nearly e