R. B. MEHROTRA, J.

( 1 ) IN Writ Petition No. 35956 of 1992, the petitioner prayed for a relief that the petitioner should be provided with the highest Z plus security failing which the Central Government, the State Government, I. AS. and I. P. S. officers will neither permit the petitioner to approach the Court and will get the petitioner killed by entangling the petitioner in some offence. The second relief prayed was that in accordance with the constitutional machinery of the country, the petitioner is praying to the Court that respondents may be asked to explain their encounter policy, and facts in the said regard may be fully looked into. The third relief claimed in the petition was that an enquiry be Tconducted by a Judicial Officer regarding all the cases pending against the petitioner. In support of the aforesaid writ petition, the petitioner filed an affidavit. In Writ Petition No. 37064 of 1992, the Home Secretary, Uttar Pradesh, the Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh and S. S. P. , Kanpur City, Kanpur were arrayed as respondents and a relief was prayed that in presence of some Judicial Officer, the petitioner be permitted to run his business of Scooter Stand and publication of Kanpur Crime Reporter or the officers, who are indulging in violating the honour of the Court and, are professionally humiliating the Court should be directed to ensure continuance of the petitioners aforesaid business. Second relief prayed in this petition was that the petitioner should be permitted in accordance with the concept of equality provided in the Indian Constitution to earn money by killing people for which the petitioner is competent and which the petitioner has proved by standing in the Court on 15th October, 1992 that the petitioner is capable of doing the same as has been done by the police by killing 20,000 people and thereby earning money or getting money on the basis of arranging these murders. Special relief prayed in the petition was that the Hontble Court may pass such orders against such professional killers so that they may realise that the judiciary of the country has its own honour and the persons indulging in deteriorating the said honour are not to be spared as has been done by Calcutta High Court in its decision reported in AI. R page 135 of 1992 holding that the Court cannot be spectator of permitting anybody to do wrong.

( 2 ) THE reliefs prayed for are in a very peculiar and vague words and do not make out any sense as to what the petitioner prayed for. However, the aforesaid writ petitions were registered as Criminal Misc. Writ Petitions in this Court and notices were issued to the respondents to me their counter affidavits. Both the matters have been heard together for a long period of four years by different Courts and the petitioners conduct is mainly responsible for this inordinate delay in deciding the case as whenever a Court wanted to hear the matter, the petitioner had been indulging in making baseless and false allegations not only against the Judges of this Court but also against the Chief Justice of this Court and entire judicial system and indulging himself even in abusing the Judges, Chief Justice of this Court as well as the Apex Court. The petitioner had also throughout been moving one application or the other making several grievances during the pendency of the matter and on above application the Court asked for a counter affidavit, the bulk of the case at present is contained in hundreds of pages, the details whereof, in short, will be given hereinafter.

( 3 ) BEFORE proceeding with the applications and affidavits which the petitioner has been filing from time to time, it is necessary to mention the contents of the petitions themselves. In Writ Petition No. 35956 of 1992, the petitioner stated that Annexures Til and 2 of the petition may be looked into. Annexure I to the petition is a Criminal Misc. Petition filed by the petitioner in the Supreme Court being Criminal Misc. Petition No. 3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document