SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 111

K.C.BHARGAVA, BRIJESH KUMAR, D.K.TRIVEDI
Vikram – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


BRIJESH KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS reference to the Full Bench arises out of a bail application which came for consideration before a learned Single Judge. The ground for release of the applicant on bail, as pressed on his behalf was that at the time of arrest,the applicant was not disclosed the full particulars and the grounds of his arrest, hence the arrest was illegal being in violation of Section 50 of the Cr. P. C. and Article 22 (1) of the Constitution of India. The applicant has filed his affidavit in support of his case that particulars of the offence were not disclosed to him, nor the grounds of arrest.

( 2 ) AS against the above, on behalf of the prosecution, the arresting officer has filed his affidavit stating about the arrest of the applicant in Crime Cash No. 262/93 under Section 307/324/302 I. P. C. and that the accused was told the grounds of his arrest. According to the prosecution, after his arrest the applicant had confessed having committed the crime and furnished information leading to recovery of a knife said to be used in commission of the offence. A recovery memo was also prepared and a copy of the same was given to him. A copy of the G. D. entry was also filed al




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top