B.N.KATJU
Chhedilal – Appellant
Versus
Kamla – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an application Under Section 482 Cr. PC
( 2 ) SMT. Kamla opposite party no. 1 filed an application under S. ,488 Crpc 1898 and S. D. M. , Baheru by his order dated 22-1-1977 allowed the said application and directed the applicant to pay Rs, 200 per month as maintenance allowance to Smt. Kamla opposite party no. 1 with effect from 26-1-72. The applicant filed Criminal Revision No. 5 of 1977 against the aforesaid order of S. D. M. , Baheru which was allowed in part by the Additional Sessions Judge, Banda by his order, a copy of which is attached as annexure III to the affidavit and the monthly allowance granted to Smt. Kamla opposite party No. 1 was reduced to Rs. 80 per month. The applicant thereafter filed this application Under Section 482 Cr. P. C. for quashing the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Banda passed in Criminal Revision No. 5 of 1977.
( 3 ) THE first question1 that requires determination is whether this application is maintainable. The applicant had filed Criminal Revision No. 5 of 1977 against the order of S. D. M. Baheru D/- 22-1-77 which was partly allowed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Banda. An application by the applicant in revi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.