SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(All) 289

B.N.KATJU
Chhedilal – Appellant
Versus
Kamla – Respondent


B. N. KATJU, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application Under Section 482 Cr. PC

( 2 ) SMT. Kamla opposite party no. 1 filed an application under S. ,488 Crpc 1898 and S. D. M. , Baheru by his order dated 22-1-1977 allowed the said application and directed the applicant to pay Rs, 200 per month as maintenance allowance to Smt. Kamla opposite party no. 1 with effect from 26-1-72. The applicant filed Criminal Revision No. 5 of 1977 against the aforesaid order of S. D. M. , Baheru which was allowed in part by the Additional Sessions Judge, Banda by his order, a copy of which is attached as annexure III to the affidavit and the monthly allowance granted to Smt. Kamla opposite party No. 1 was reduced to Rs. 80 per month. The applicant thereafter filed this application Under Section 482 Cr. P. C. for quashing the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Banda passed in Criminal Revision No. 5 of 1977.

( 3 ) THE first question1 that requires determination is whether this application is maintainable. The applicant had filed Criminal Revision No. 5 of 1977 against the order of S. D. M. Baheru D/- 22-1-77 which was partly allowed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Banda. An application by the applicant in revi







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top