B.S.CHAUHAN, D.P.GUPTA
Lal Harsh Deo Narain Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS writ petition has been filed for directing the respondents not to interfere with the shop and plot of the petitioners and further prohibit the respondents not to trespass into the possession of the petitioners plot without having any right.
( 2 ) PETITIONERS grievance is that the respondent No. 5 who is his cousin brother, has executed an agreement with the respondent No. 4, the Managing Director of Reliance India, Lucknow in respect of the property in dispute and the respondent No. 4 to start with the construction over the said land with the collusion of respondent No. 5, though the respondent No. 5 did not have any authority to transfer the rights in favour of the respondent No. 4.
( 3 ) THE learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents has submitted that as a suit between the parties is pending and against the order passed therein a F. A. F. O. No. Nil of 1984, has been filed in which this Court vide order dated 10. 5. 1984, stayed the further proceedings in the Civil court, Gyanpur, District Varanasi, this would not be desirable for this. Court to interfere in the matter as the petitioners, raise the dispute questions of fact, particularly, reg
REFERRED TO : K.R.Rashid and Sons v. Income-tax Investigation Commission and Ors.
K.R.Rashid and Sons v. Income-tax Investigation Commission and Ors.
A.V.Venkateswaran, Collector of Customs, Bombay v. Ramchand Sobhraj Wadhwani and Anr.
Jai Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
Bombay Metropolitan Region Development Authority, Bombay v. Gokak Volkart Ltd.and Ors.
Dr.Buddhi Kota Subbarao v. K. Parasaran and Ors.
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and Anr. v. N. Raju Reddiar and Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.