SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(All) 1222

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
R.K. Agarwal and K.N. Ojha, JJ.
Marble Men and Handicrafts Inn
Versus
Commissioner of Income-tax
Civil Misc. Writ Petition 962 of 2000
Decided On : 26 July 2004
Civil Misc. Writ Petition 962 Of 2000

Advocates Appeared:
A.N.Mahajan, ASHOK KUMAR, Manish Goel,

Special deduction under Section 80hhc is available for counter sales subjected to customs clearance.

Headnote:

Income-tax Act - Special Deduction - Counter Sales - Summary: The court considered the challenge to notices issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act for the withdrawal of special deduction under Section 80hhc in respect of counter sales made against foreign exchange. The court relied on previous decisions and held that the deduction is available for counter sales subjected to customs clearance, and therefore, the notices were quashed.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, engaged in the business of handicrafts and marble goods, challenged notices seeking to withdraw special deduction under Section 80hhc for counter sales made against foreign exchange.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the deduction is available for counter sales subjected to customs clearance, as per previous decisions, and therefore quashed the notices.

Issues: Challenge to notices seeking to withdraw special deduction under Section 80hhc for counter sales made against foreign exchange.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on previous decisions holding that the deduction is available for counter sales subjected to customs clearance, and therefore quashed the notices.

Final Decision: The court set aside the notices issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act and consequential proceedings.

( 1 ) IN Writ Petitions Nos. 875 and 961 of 2000 filed by M/s. Marble Men, notices issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") for the assessment year 1996-97 and for the assessment year 1998-99, respectively, have been challenged. In Writ petition No. 962 of 2000 filed by M/s. Handicrafts Inn, notice under Section 148 of the Act issued for the assessment year 1998-99 has been challenged.

( 2 ) SINCE in all these three petitions, a common question has been raised, they have been heard together and are being decided by a common order.

( 3 ) THE petitioners in all these petitions are dealers engaged in the business of handicrafts items and marble goods in the city of Agra. They cater to the needs of foreign tourists who visit the city. The goods sold against foreign exchange while taking the goods out of the country require customs clearance at the airport. The petitioners claim benefit of special deduction under Section 80hhc of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of the turnover and profit of counter sales made against convertible foreign exchange to the foreign tourists. The assessing authority in the original assessment accepted the claim and granted deduction. However, he issued notices under section 148 of the Income-tax Act seeking to withdraw the deduction granted to the petitioners under Section 80hhc of the Act.

( 4 ) WE have heard Sri Manish Goel, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri A. N. Mahajan, learned additional standing counsel appearing in Writ Petition No. 875 of 2000 and Sri Ashok kumar who appears in all other writ petitions.

( 5 ) IT is not in dispute that the notices under Section 148 have been issued only to withdraw the deduction granted to the petitioners under Section 80hhc of the Act in respect of the counter sales made against foreign exchange. A Division Bench of this court in the case of Ram Babu and Sons v. Union of India [1996] 222 ITR 606 has held that benefit of special deduction under section 80hhc is available in respect of the counter sales effected against the convertible foreign exchange if the goods are taken out of the country and the transaction is subjected to customs clearance. The aforesaid view has been approved by the honble Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Silver and Arts Palace [2003] 259 ITR 684. Since the view taken by this court in the case of Ram Babu and Sons [1996] 222 ITR 606 has been approved by the honble Supreme court in the case of CIT v. Silver and Arts Palace (2003) 259 ITR 684, and this court has taken the view that even counter sales made against foreign exchange and which are subjected to customs clearance, are entitled for deduction under Section 80hhc of the Act, there cannot be any reasonable belief upon which the Assessing Officer can form the opinion that any income has escaped assessment to tax or any deduction has been wrongly allowed so as to fall under section 148 of the Act and ; thus, only on this ground if the notice has been issued, it cannot be sustained and is taken to be quashed. It may be mentioned here that the view taken by this court has been approved by the honble Supreme Court in Silver and Arts Palaces case [2003] 259 ITR 684. This is an additional reason that the notices cannot be sustained.

( 6 ) SRI A. N. Mahajan, learned counsel appearing for the Revenue, relied upon a decision of the honble Supreme Court in the case of GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. ITO (2003) 259 ITR 19 and submitted that the petitioner ought to be relegated to file return in pursuance of the notice under Section 148 and submit its reply. It will not be proper for the Commissioner of Income-tax to drop the proceedings. The submission is misconceived inasmuch as when the notice under section 148 of the Act was issued by the Assessing Officer, the law laid down in the case of ram Babu and Sons [1996] 222 ITR 606 (All) was holding the field. Till such time the said decision is not reversed or disapproved by the ho




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top