UMESHWAR PANDEY, MARKANDEY KATJU
Commissioner of Income Tax Sahara India Savings and Investment Corp. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sahara India Savings and Investment Corporation Ltd. Asstt. CIT – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an appeal under Section 260a of the IT Act challenging the order dt. 15th Oct. , 1999, of the Tribunal, Allahabad. This appeal and connected appeals ITA Nos. 72 of 2003, 36 of 2000, 38 of 2000, 40 of 2000, 154 of 2000 and 155 of 2000 are being disposed of by a common judgment.
( 2 ) HEARD Shri Bharatji Agarwal, learned senior standing counsel for the Department, and Shri percy Pardiwalla and Shri S. D. Singh for the respondents.
( 3 ) WE have carefully perused the record. The respondent-company is a company registered under the Indian Companies Act. In the order of the CIT (A) in ITA No. 154 of 2000, it is mentioned that as per the memorandum of association the objects for which the company was established are :
"1. To establish, promote, conduct, manage, maintain, improve, regulate, run, work and control the different types of schemes for encouraging the habit of savings and wise economy amongst the public on scientific, practical lines and also help men, women and children for their economical, social and educational welfare through its schemes. The company shall carry on business as per the guide lines of RBI directives but shall not carry on business o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.