2003 Supreme(All) 2039
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
M.Katju and Umeshwar Pandey, JJ.
Commissioner of Income Tax Sahara India Savings and Investment Corp. Ltd.
Versus
Sahara India Savings and Investment Corporation Ltd.Asstt. CIT
IT Appeal 155 of 2000
Decided On : 22 September 2003
IT Appeal 72 Of 2003
BHARATJI AGARWAL, PERCY PARDIWALA, S.D.SINGH,
The literal rule of interpretation in taxing statutes and the requirements for a company to be considered a miscellaneous finance company under the IT Act.
Headnote:
IT Act - Taxability of Assessee-Company - Section 4, Section 2(7), Section 2(5b) - The court discussed the interpretation of the word 'interest' and the definition of 'financial company' under the IT Act. The court emphasized the literal rule of interpretation in taxing statutes and held that interest only means interest on loans and advances. It also clarified that to be a miscellaneous finance company, a company must carry on exclusively, or almost exclusively, two or more classes of business referred to in the Act.
Fact of the Case:
The appeals related to the taxability of the assessee-company under the Interest-tax Act, 1974. The respondent-company was registered under the Indian Companies Act and the appeals concerned the interpretation of the word 'interest' and the definition of 'financial company' under the IT Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that interest only means interest on loans and advances and clarified the requirements for a company to be considered a miscellaneous finance company under the Act. It dismissed the appeals as it found that the respondent-company was not carrying on any other business except as mentioned in its memorandum of association.
Issues: Interpretation of the word 'interest' under the IT Act and determination of the respondent-company's classification as a financial company.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the literal rule of interpretation in taxing statutes and held that interest only means interest on loans and advances. It also clarified the requirements for a company to be considered a miscellaneous finance company under the Act.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeals as it found that the respondent-company was not carrying on any other business except as mentioned in its memorandum of association.
( 1 ) THIS is an appeal under Section 260a of the IT Act challenging the order dt. 15th Oct. , 1999, of the Tribunal, Allahabad. This appeal and connected appeals ITA Nos. 72 of 2003, 36 of 2000, 38 of 2000, 40 of 2000, 154 of 2000 and 155 of 2000 are being disposed of by a common judgment.
( 2 ) HEARD Shri Bharatji Agarwal, learned senior standing counsel for the Department, and Shri percy Pardiwalla and Shri S. D. Singh for the respondents.
( 3 ) WE have carefully perused the record. The respondent-company is a company registered under the Indian Companies Act. In the order of the CIT (A) in ITA No. 154 of 2000, it is mentioned that as per the memorandum of association the objects for which the company was established are :
"1. To establish, promote, conduct, manage, maintain, improve, regulate, run, work and control the different types of schemes for encouraging the habit of savings and wise economy amongst the public on scientific, practical lines and also help men, women and children for their economical, social and educational welfare through its schemes. The company shall carry on business as per the guide lines of RBI directives but shall not carry on business of chain letters, prize chit schemes, money circulating schemes, chit funds auction, nor the banking business as defined under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, or any other scheme banned by any law. 2. To buy, sell, invest or otherwise deal in securities, bonds or fixed deposits issued by any institution, body corporate, corporation, established or constituted under any central or state enactments or in other securities in which the company may be required to invest under any law in force. "
( 4 ) THIS appeal is being pressed on three grounds which are stated in the memorandum of appeal. The facts of the case are narrated in detail in the orders of the IT authorities and the Tribunal, and we shall refer to them when we deal with the submissions of learned counsel for the parties.
( 5 ) THESE appeals relate to the taxability of the assessee-company under the Interest-tax Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). Originally, as mentioned in the Statement of Objects and reasons to the Act, the object of the AO was to impose a special tax on the total amount of interest received by scheduled banks on loans and advances made in India. However, major amendments were made to the Act by Finance No. 2 Act, of 1991 w. e. f. 1st Oct. , 1991.
( 6 ) ORIGINALLY Section 4, which is the charging section, imposed a tax only on scheduled banks. However, by Finance Act, 2 of 1991, Section 4 was renumbered as Sub-section (1), and sub-section (2) was inserted which states :
"notwithstanding anything contained in Sub-section (1) but subject to the other provisions of this Act, there shall be charged on every credit institution for every assessment year commencing on and from the 1st day of April, 1992, interest-tax in respect of its chargeable interest of the previous year at the rate of three per cent of such chargeable interest. "
Thus, Section 4 (2) now imposes interest-tax on credit institutions in respect of the chargeable interest. Hence, to impose interest-tax under Section 4 (2) two requirements must be fulfilled : (1)it can be imposed only on credit institutions, (2) it can be imposed only on the chargeable interest. Credit institution has been defined in Section 2 (5a) of the Act to mean : (i) a banking company to which the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, applies; (ii) a public financial institution as defined in Section 4a of the Companies Act, 1956; (iii) a State financial corporation established under Section 3 or Section 3a or an institution notified under Section 46 of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951, and (iv) any other financial company. The word interest in Section 2 (7) of the Act, prior to its amendment w. e. f. 1st Oct. , 1991, was defined as follows :"interest means interest in loans and advances made in India and includes : (a) commitment