SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 1813

R.H.ZAIDI, R.D.SHUKLA
BHAJJOO ALIAS JAGAT PAL YADAV – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE JHANSI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Virendra Bhatia,

R. H. ZAIDI, J.

In all these habeas corpus pelilions, common questions of law and fact are involved, they were, therefore, heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. By means of these petitions, pelilioncrs pray for issuance of a writ, or ders or directions in The nature of habeas corpus to relcase the petitioners from detention and declaring their detention as illegal. Prayer for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the naunx of ceniorciri quashing the detention orders dated 11 -6-1999, 14-6-1999 and 23-6-1999 passed by District Magistralc, Jhansi has also been made.

3. Relevant facts of the case giving rise to the above noted pelilions, in brief are that the detention orders noted above were served upon the petitioners atone with the grounds of detention, while they were in jail in connection with case crime No. 16/99 under Section 395/397, IPC etc. of P. S. Month, District Jhansi, said order-were based on sofitary incident dated 22-2-1999. It was staled that said date was fixed for filing nomination papers of the can didates for the post of Administrafor of Sadhan Sahkari Samiti of Distrkt Jhansi. For filing his nomination paper, Gajendra Singh son



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top