R.H.ZAIDI, R.D.SHUKLA
BHAJJOO ALIAS JAGAT PAL YADAV – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE JHANSI – Respondent
In all these habeas corpus pelilions, common questions of law and fact are involved, they were, therefore, heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. By means of these petitions, pelilioncrs pray for issuance of a writ, or ders or directions in The nature of habeas corpus to relcase the petitioners from detention and declaring their detention as illegal. Prayer for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the naunx of ceniorciri quashing the detention orders dated 11 -6-1999, 14-6-1999 and 23-6-1999 passed by District Magistralc, Jhansi has also been made.
3. Relevant facts of the case giving rise to the above noted pelilions, in brief are that the detention orders noted above were served upon the petitioners atone with the grounds of detention, while they were in jail in connection with case crime No. 16/99 under Section 395/397, IPC etc. of P. S. Month, District Jhansi, said order-were based on sofitary incident dated 22-2-1999. It was staled that said date was fixed for filing nomination papers of the can didates for the post of Administrafor of Sadhan Sahkari Samiti of Distrkt Jhansi. For filing his nomination paper, Gajendra Singh son
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.