POONAM SRIVASTAVA
NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Appellant
Versus
RAJA RAM B – Respondent
Heard Sri U. S. Awasthi, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri B. D. Mandhyan, senior advocate, assisted by Sri S. C. Mandhyan, Sri A. K. Singh and Sri Badri Singh advocates for the plaintiff-respondent.
2. The plaintiff-respondent instituted a suit No. 974 of 1995 against the defendant-appellant for injunction in respect of Plot No. 40 area 150 sq. yards situated in khasra No. 16m Village Mamura, Pargana and Tehsil Dadri, District Ghaziabad (hereinafter referred as disputed land ). The plaintiff claimed his title on the basis of allotment made by Land Management Committee in the year 1974 to one Hukum Singh as he was a member of Scheduled Caste community. Hukum Singh aforesaid executed a sale-deed on 23. 5. 1995 for an amount of Rs. 45,000 in favour of the plaintiff and subsequent to the sale-deed, the plaintiff is owner in occupation. Since the disputed land is in the vicinity of Sector 59 of N. O. I. D. A. authority (defendant-appellant), they are interfering in the plaintiffs construction over the disputed land and the employees of N. O. I. D. A. have demolished the construction of a number of allottees, including plaintiff. N. O. I. D. A. has given alt
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.