SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 1575

V.M.SAHAI, SABHAJEET YADAV
Ram Briksha Prasad Indra Dev – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.SINGH, Ashok Khare, C.B.Yadav, Wasim Alam,

SABHAJEET YADAV, J.

( 1 ) BY this petition, the petitioner has sought relief of certiorari for quashing the order dated 16. 9. 2005 passed by the Inspector General of Registration, U. P. , Allahabad, contained in annexure-13 of the writ petition whereby the petitioner has been compulsorily retired from service while working on the post of Sub-Registrar, Nagina, Bijnor in purported exercise of power conferred by Rule 56 (c) of U. P. Fundamental Rules contained in Vol. II Part 2 to 4 of u. P. Financial Hand Book and further relief of certiorari was asked for quashing the order dated 12. 9. 2003 passed by Inspector General of Registration, U. P. Allahabad, contained in Annexure-9 of the writ petition whereby four penalties were inflicted upon the petitioner and further a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus was sought for not to interfere in the working of the petitioner as Sub Registrar and to pay him regular salary month to month on the said post.

( 2 ) THE relief sought in the writ petition rests on allegation that petitioner was appointed as Sub registrar on 15. 4. 1989 by the Inspector General of Registration after due selection by U. P. Public Service Commission, Al

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top