V.M.SAHAI, SABHAJEET YADAV
Ram Briksha Prasad Indra Dev – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
( 1 ) BY this petition, the petitioner has sought relief of certiorari for quashing the order dated 16. 9. 2005 passed by the Inspector General of Registration, U. P. , Allahabad, contained in annexure-13 of the writ petition whereby the petitioner has been compulsorily retired from service while working on the post of Sub-Registrar, Nagina, Bijnor in purported exercise of power conferred by Rule 56 (c) of U. P. Fundamental Rules contained in Vol. II Part 2 to 4 of u. P. Financial Hand Book and further relief of certiorari was asked for quashing the order dated 12. 9. 2003 passed by Inspector General of Registration, U. P. Allahabad, contained in Annexure-9 of the writ petition whereby four penalties were inflicted upon the petitioner and further a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus was sought for not to interfere in the working of the petitioner as Sub Registrar and to pay him regular salary month to month on the said post.
( 2 ) THE relief sought in the writ petition rests on allegation that petitioner was appointed as Sub registrar on 15. 4. 1989 by the Inspector General of Registration after due selection by U. P. Public Service Commission, Al
REFERRED TO : State of U.P. and Ors. v. Chatersen
State of U.P. and Ors. v. Vijai Kumar Jain
Baikuntha Nath Das and Anr. v. Chief District Medical Officer, Baripada and Anr.
Roberts v. Hopwood; Union of India v. H.C. Goel
S.Pratap Singh v. State of Punjab
State of Punjab v. Gurdas Singh
Express Newspapers Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.